Summary
Patients diagnosed with early-stage cancer frequently undergo surgery to remove the tumour. However, it is often hard to tell if the disease has already spread to other parts of the body, i.e. there is minimal residual disease (MRD). The challenge facing healthcare teams today is to determine which patients have MRD and so need additional treatment (such as chemotherapy or radiotherapy) to destroy any remaining cancer cells which may have escaped the surgeon’s scalpel, and which patients do not need further treatment. This is extremely important as many cancer treatments come with multiple side effects, so treating patients unnecessarily may cause more harm than good. At the same time, not treating patients who need it allows the cancer to reoccur and potentially spread.
Current imaging technologies are not sensitive enough to detect MRD, pointing to the need for more sensitive tests that are able to detect traces of cancer remaining in the body after surgery.
The GUIDE.MRD project aims to address this challenge by exploring how blood tests could be used to identify which patients might benefit from additional treatment, and which patients would likely not benefit from treatment. The project focuses on patients with lung, pancreatic and colorectal cancers.
Cancers usually shed small fragments of tumour DNA into the patient’s bloodstream, and these circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) fragments can be recognised and detected by blood tests. While tests to detect ctDNA in blood samples already exist, the level of ctDNA each test can detect varies from one test to another, and the key details of how these tests work are not publicly available. This makes it hard to gauge the accuracy of the tests; once we know that the details of a blood test are accurate, clinicians, regulators and patients will have confidence in the results and healthcare teams will be able to better integrate the blood tests into their clinical practice to improve patient care.
GUIDE.MRD’s first step will be to define standards and use them to benchmark ctDNA tests available now. When ready, the standards will be made public so that they can be used widely. The project will rank existing blood tests according to how accurate they are at correctly identifying patients as either ctDNA positive or negative. The team will then use the most promising ctDNA blood tests in a clinical trial and compare the accuracy of the ctDNA blood tests against clinical outcomes to treatments. Finally, the most accurate ctDNA blood tests will be used as a tool to help doctors and patients select the right treatment for their individual situation.
Participants
Show participants on mapUniversities, research organisations, public bodies, non-profit groups
- Aarhus Universitet, Aarhus C, Denmark
- Aarhus Universitetshospital, Aarhus, Denmark
- Academisch Ziekenhuis Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
- Asociatia Centrul Pentru Inovatie In Medicina, Bucharest, Romania
- Centre Hospitalier Universitaire De Nice, Nice, France
- Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Montpellier, Montpellier, France
- Fundacion Sector Publico Estatal Centro Nacional Investigaciones Oncologicas Carlos Iii, Madrid, Spain
- Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
- Lungenclinic Grosshansdorf GMBH, Grosshansdorf, Germany
- Medizinische Universitat Graz, Graz, Austria
- Region Stockholm, Stockholm, Sweden
- Universitaetsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
Small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) and mid-sized companies (<€500 m turnover)
- Innovation Acta SRL, Roma, Italy
- Synergist Services, Bruxelles, Belgium
- The Synergist, Bruxelles, Belgium
Patient organisations
- Digestive Cancers Europe Dice, Brussels, Belgium
- Lung Cancer Europe Luce, Bern, Switzerland
IHI industry partners
- Abbvie Deutschland GMBH & Co Kg, Wiesbaden, Germany
- Abbvie Inc, North Chicago, Illinois, United States
- Amgen (Europe) GMBH, Zug, Switzerland
- Amgen Inc, Thousand Oaks, United States
- AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP, Wilmington, United States
- Astrazeneca Uk Limited, Cambridge, United Kingdom
- Bristol-Myers Squibb B.V., Utrecht, Netherlands
- Bristol-Myers Squibb Company Corp, Princeton, NJ, United States
- Bristol-Myers Squibb GMBH & Co. Kgaa, Munich, Germany
- Bristol-Myers Squibb SAS, Rueil-Malmaison, France
- E.R. Squibb & Sons Llc, New Brunswick, United States
- F. Hoffmann-La Roche AG, Basel, Switzerland
- Horizon Discovery Limited, Cambridge, United Kingdom
- Illumina Cambridge Limited, Great Abington, United Kingdom
- Illumina Inc., San Diego, United States
Contributing partners
- Seracare Life Sciences Inc, Delaware, United States
Participants | |
---|---|
Name | EU funding in € |
Aarhus Universitet | 1 142 500 |
Aarhus Universitetshospital | 2 701 344 |
Academisch Ziekenhuis Groningen | 1 513 496 |
Asociatia Centrul Pentru Inovatie In Medicina | 276 250 |
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire De Nice | 719 625 |
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Montpellier | 1 385 764 |
Digestive Cancers Europe Dice | 289 750 |
Fundacion Sector Publico Estatal Centro Nacional Investigaciones Oncologicas Carlos Iii | 1 272 889 |
Innovation Acta SRL | 377 734 |
Karolinska Institutet | 655 138 |
Lungenclinic Grosshansdorf GMBH | 765 364 |
Medizinische Universitat Graz | 1 918 230 |
Region Stockholm | 853 336 |
Synergist Services | 842 716 |
The Synergist | 600 901 |
Universitaetsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf | 2 345 919 |
Total Cost | 17 660 956 |